• Skip to main content
pt-wealth-logo
02 9891 1544
×
  • Meet Tony
  • Our values
  • Services
  • I want to…
  • Insights
  • Get in touch
  • Important information
Let's talk

Jacqueline Barton

Economic update: August 2025

Jacqueline Barton · Sep 2, 2025 ·

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

KEY POINTS

  • Trump’s tariffs go live on 1 August – though some negotiations still ongoing.

  • Economic data indicated some softening in growth leading central banks to resume easing.

  • Equity markets remaining buoyed by generally positive US reporting season and prospect of interest rate cuts.

  • The RBA surprised markets by not cutting the official cash rate at its July meeting.

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact your Financial Adviser.

THE BIG PICTURE

At last, the August 1st deadline for Trump’s tariff negotiations has arrived. While big numbers are still being bandied around, markets took the deadline in its stride.

Trump promised ‘great deals’ for the US in a bid to reduce or remove trade deficits and ‘non-tariff trade barriers’. But the truth seems far from the Trump vision.

The S&P 500 and NASDAQ Wall Street indexes hit repeated highs during July – a far cry from the turmoil created in April when the so-called ‘reciprocal tariffs’ were first mooted. Markets have moved on from Trumps fearmongering.

Trump was fixated on trade deficits and well-trained economists know that tariffs are not a cure for trade deficits. Indeed, deficits are not necessarily a bad thing. He exhorted that the US buys lots of cars from Japan but Japan doesn’t buy US cars. He failed to point out that the Japanese drive on the left (as do we) and so would need expensive conversion kits or a dedicated US production line to manufacture right hand drive cars – and at the right price and size for Japan’s roads!

He made a similar point about Vietnam not buying US manufactured goods. Vietnamese on average earn less than $US5,000 p.a. and how much are US made cars?

As far as we can ascertain, no concrete deals have been made in the sense of signed contracts. CNBC reported that eight ‘frameworks’ or loose commitments have been made but it could take years to formalise these complex notions. Eight deals is a far cry from the 90 deals in 90 days the administration predicted in early April. And 200 deals being negotiated now seems fantasy!

The UK was the first cab off the rank to get a so-called deal months ago – at 10%. But Trump slapped a huge 50% tariff on steel and aluminium (and now copper) after that so-called agreement. As late as July, Trump met with his opposite number, PM Keir Starmer, in Trump’s Turnberry golf course to ‘refine’ the ‘agreement’.

He chose the same Scottish venue to work out a 15% deal with the EU. Part of the ‘deal’ was said to be a $750B purchase of US energy and $600B investment in the US. Several commentators pointed out that these sums included many projects already agreed to! It is close to impossible to get an independent appraisal of these ‘deals’.

In the same cavalier style, Trump and his entourage descended upon the Federal Treasury building in Washington to confront Fed chair Powell over the cost blow out in the Fed refurbishments that were started a decade ago – and to put pressure on Powell to cut rates.

On camera, Trump upped his estimate of the blowout from $2.7B to $3.1B and handed Powell a letter to back up his claim. Powell quickly pointed out that the latest increase detailed in the letter was due to now including a third building that was completed five years ago. A journalist then asked a direct question about whether there was enough evidence to dismiss Powell. Trump dithered but answered no.

Trump appears to be operating without the checks and balances of Congress determining and imposing penalties without rational justification or consultation. Strategically it may be prudent for reluctant combatants to engage as small targets and avoid or limit confrontation until Trump’s term as president ends. Conversely, court cases are currently being heard that might rule his trade deals illegal. Many think the cases will make it to US Supreme Court, this process could take months at least.

Before Trump’s second term as president, the average import tariff into the US was 2.7%. As at August 1st that average is close to 18%. The tariff deals negotiated to date only seem good because of the excessive levels of his estimates of the revenue generated by the reciprocal tariffs.

Trump repeatedly states that US interest payments on its debt would fall by $360B for each point decrease in the Fed rate. As with all loans, the rate charged depends upon a variety of factors including the term of the loan. Just as with home mortgage payments, different rates are offered for loans of different fixed terms such as one, two and three years – or variable rates. Indeed, when the Fed cuts its overnight rate, it is not unusual for the yield on longer-term Treasurys to go up rather than down! Indeed, the 100 bps of cuts so far in this cycle have had no discernible impact on the 10-year Treasury yield. And no-one, other than banks in the clearing system, borrows or lends at the Fed Funds Interest Rate.

At the Fed Reserve building site press conference, Trump pointed out that the US economy was ‘hot’ but that an appropriate Fed rate would be 1%! While we think the US economy is not broken it is certainly not hot. If it were, and the Fed rate was cut to 1%, inflation of a scale we have not witnessed for a long time would probably re-emerge!

The impact of new tariffs on US inflation has been a long time coming. Front loading inventory building and delays in tariff impositions has pushed out that impact. However, the June US CPI and PCE inflation reads published in July did show a slight blip up in the data. There are two reasons not to worry too much about tariff-induced inflation. First, tariffs are a one off and, therefore, do not constitute inflation in the sense of macroeconomic policy. Keeping rates on hold or otherwise will not affect any blip. Secondly, it is now thought that the tariff-induced price increase (not inflation!) is likely to be only about 1% (or possibly up to 2%) and it will be gone by late 2026.

The Australian economy is in a very different position to the US. Our jobs data are showing nascent signs of weakness and GDP growth (in per capita terms) has been negative for most of the last two years and more.

It was reported that more than half of the Australian electorate derives its major source of income from the government (i.e. the taxpayer). The impact of private sector wealth on total employment is, therefore, muted.

The RBA astounded economists by not cutting Interest rates at the July meeting. The market is now pricing a reasonable chance of a double interest rate cut at the August 12th meeting. The RBA claimed it was waiting for the quarterly CPI Inflation data as a more accurate reading than the monthly variant. The quarterly read for June quarter came in at 2.1% and the monthly at 1.9%. With the target range being 2% to 3%, the RBA needs to get a move on and resume reducing the cash interest rate.

Earnings season for US companies is going well for the June quarter and much better than many expected not that long ago. We believe that there is a long way to run on the AI boom and Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will add some stimulus in the near term. What the future of the US economy is in the longer term is more opaque but we are optimistic about US equities for the rest of this year – at least.

US Treasury yields have stabilised in recent weeks. The 10-year and 30-year Government Bond yields are now comfortably below the 4.5% and 5.0% thresholds that rattled markets back in April.

The Fed kept rates on hold at their July meeting and until the announcement of weaker employment data, had stepped back from an interest rate cut in September. However, market pricing indicates the Fed may produce one or two more cuts this year.

Asset classes

AUSTRALIAN EQUITIES

The ASX 200 had a strong month to start the 2026 financial year. Capital gains for the broader index were +2.3%. Healthcare led the way with a gain of +9.1% and Energy (+5.7%) and Materials (+4.1%) were not far behind; Utilities gained +5.1% and IT (+5.0%). Financials (-1.0%) was the only sector to lose ground.

INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES

The S&P 500 also performed strongly in July with a gain of +2.2%. Indeed, this index posted six consecutive daily closing highs late in the month.

The London FTSE Index was even stronger at +4.2%; Emerging Markets posted a gain of 3.1% and China’s Shanghai Composite Index +3.7%.

BONDS AND INTEREST RATES

The Fed continued to resist Trump’s calls to cut interest rates and remained on hold at its July 30th meeting. Powell moved markets slightly when he mentioned, in questioning, that an interest rate cut in September was not the almost forgone conclusion that the market had anticipated.

The yield on 10-year and 30-year US Treasuries remained comfortably below the ‘psychological’ levels of respectively 4.5% and 5.0% throughout the month.

The CME Fedwatch tool reduced the chance of a September interest rate cut from about 67% to 40% during Powel’s post meeting press conference.

The RBA astounded markets by not cutting the official cash interest rate at its July meeting but it looks set to make at least one 25-bps (0.25%) cut on August 12th. The chance of a double cut was priced at 51% on the RBA tracker tool located on the ASX website.

The Bank of Japan was also on hold – but at 0.5%. Another hike is expected this year to help combat inflation.

The Bank of Canada was on hold at 2.75% but it forecast GDP growth in June quarter of -1.5%.

The ECB was on hold at 2.15% and June quarter growth came in at +0.1%.

OTHER ASSETS

Brent Crude oil (+7.3%) and West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI) (+6.4%) oil prices were up strongly in July.

The price of gold was flat (+0.4%) in July while the price of copper (-4.0%) was down sharply after Trump announced a 50% tariff on the US imports of the metal. The price of iron ore was up +6.2%.

The US equity market VIX ‘fear’ index was range-bound near normal levels.

The Australian dollar (-1.2%) was down modestly against the greenback.

REGIONAL REVIEW

AUSTRALIA

The last two months of changes in Australia jobs data more or less cancelled each other out to leave a flatline in total employment and its major components. The unemployment rate jumped up from 4.1% to 4.3% after a year of little movement. It is too soon to ring the alarm bells but unemployment can rise sharply when a big slowdown gets underway.

Australia appears to be making little headway in getting a trade deal done with the US. The negotiated tariff was said to be 10% in April but now Trump is talking of 20%. It appears Albanese cannot even get a meeting with Trump. The US is not one of our big trading partners, but any new instability could increase the prospect of further slowing in our economy.

CHINA

The US is trying to encourage China into diverting its manufacturing output into domestic consumption. Deflation is still rife; Producer Prices (PPI), or inflation of inputs, stood at -3.6% in the latest reading.

China exports grew at 5.8% against an expected 5.0% and up from 4.8% in the previous month. China is pivoting its export drive away from the US.

The US and China are continuing their trade negotiations. The ’due date’ seems to be flexible providing the US thinks China is acting in good faith. China still holds the whip hand on rare earth exports. It has also brought up relaxing US export controls the US usually attributes to ‘security issues’.

UNITED STATES

US jobs (non-farm payrolls) were up +147,000 and the unemployment rate was down to 4.1% following 4.2% in the previous month.

Trump’s so-called Big Beautiful Bill got through the House and the Senate. The consequences of it are not fully understood. There are tax cuts and some stimulus spending but there isn’t a clear direction for the US economy.

One commentator on CNBC TV speculated that Trump has by stealth created a Value Added Tax VAT (sales) tax through the tariff programme. Trump cannot reasonably be seen to raise corporate or personal taxes but a ‘tariff’ can be seen as being different. Since business and individuals are, in effect, paying the tariffs of around 18%, they are paying the equivalent of a European style VAT without Trump losing face! The US needs the revenue. Perhaps this was a smart way to raise it?

General Motors, in a report to the stock exchange for the June quarter, pointed out that it lost US$1.1 Bn from tariffs in the quarter. It now expects the impact over a full year to be US$2 Bn. Business and consumers are carrying the can and Trump does not acknowledge this.

The new tariffs on cars imported from the EU and Japan are now at a cost advantage to those built by US brands in Mexico and Canada because of the difference in tariffs!

CPI inflation did rise a little to 2.7% p.a. but, ex-shelter, CPI is still on target at 2% p.a. However, that 2% p.a. is a sharp rise over the previous comparable 1.5% p.a. The pass-through of tariffs might well be underway. Fed chair, Jerome Powell, pointed out that the easing of inflation in services has masked some of the tariff-induced price rises in goods.

Growth for the June quarter was published at the end of July. It came in at 3.0% but it should not be viewed in isolation – as Powell pointed out. Imports were up +37.9% in the March quarter and down -30.3% in the June quarter as importers tried to minimise the impact of introduction of tariffs. The average GDP growth for the first half of 2025 was 1.2% p.a., which is about half of what existed in 2024.

EUROPE

Europe diligently tried to negotiate a trade deal with the US. It finished up with a tariff of 15% on most goods but some are tariff free!

At least the US dropped its commentary about VAT (or GST) being a trade barrier. The EU is to buy US$750 Bn of energy from the US and US$600 Bn of investment in the US economy. However, many sources claim that much of this commitment is already in place.

EU growth in the June quarter was +0.1% but Germany’s GDP was down -0.1%. German inflation dipped to 1.8%.

UK inflation hit an 18-month high at 3.6% and core inflation was at 3.7%.

REST OF THE WORLD

The UK has threatened Israel with acknowledging the State of Palestine if sense is not brought to bear over Gaza.

Japan negotiated a 15% trade deal with the US and has agreed to invest US$550 Bn in the US economy.

The US imposed a tariff of 15% on Israel and 35% on Canada (but 40% if there is transhipping). The US imposed an array of tariffs of between 10% and 41% on other countries.

India currently has a negotiated tariff of 25% (plus penalties for trading with Russia). Korea’s tariff has come down to 15% from 25%; they have agreed to spend US$100 Bn on US energy and US$350 Bn on other investments.

The Bank of Canada held interest rates steady at 2.75% in July but it is predicting a -1.5% fall in June quarter GDP growth.

Investing with Purpose: A Guide to Sustainable Wealth Creation

Jacqueline Barton · Aug 11, 2025 ·

As global awareness of environmental and social issues continues to grow, Australians are increasingly seeking ways to align their financial decisions with their personal values. Sustainable investing offers a powerful opportunity to do just that—supporting positive change while building long-term wealth.

What Is Sustainable Investing?

Sustainable investing involves selecting investments that aim to deliver strong financial returns while also contributing to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes. This includes:

  • Environmental: Supporting companies that reduce carbon emissions, promote renewable energy, and conserve natural resources.
  • Social: Investing in businesses that champion diversity, human rights, and community development.
  • Governance: Backing organisations with transparent leadership, ethical practices, and strong shareholder accountability

Why It Matters

In Australia, ESG criteria are becoming a central part of investment decision-making. Investors are increasingly considering factors such as carbon footprint, diversity and inclusion, and corporate governance when evaluating opportunities

This shift reflects a growing desire to make a positive impact without sacrificing financial performance.

Investment Strategies for Sustainability

There are several ways to incorporate sustainable principles into your portfolio:

  • Thematic Investing: Focus on sectors like clean energy, sustainable agriculture, or ethical technology.
  • Impact Investing: Target investments that aim to generate measurable social or environmental benefits.
  • ESG Integration: Include ESG factors in traditional financial analysis to identify long-term risks and opportunities

Australian Leaders in Sustainability

Australia is home to many companies leading the way in sustainable practices. Examples include:

  • Renewable energy firms investing in wind and solar projects.
  • Financial institutions supporting community development through ethical lending.
  • Consumer brands committed to reducing waste and improving supply chain transparency

Getting Started

If you’re considering sustainable investing, here are a few practical steps:

  1. Clarify Your Values: Identify the causes and issues that matter most to you.
  2. Research ESG Ratings: Use online tools to assess the sustainability performance of companies and funds.
  3. Consult a Financial Adviser: Seek guidance on building a portfolio that reflects your values and financial goals

Challenges to Consider

While sustainable investing offers many benefits, it’s important to be aware of potential challenges:

  • Performance Evaluation: ESG investments may perform differently than traditional ones, especially in the short term.
  • Standardisation: ESG reporting varies across companies, making comparisons difficult.
  • Trade-offs: Some ethical choices may involve accepting lower returns or higher volatility

Sustainable investing is about more than just returns – it’s about responsibility. By aligning your investments with your values, you can help shape a better future while pursuing your financial goals.

From Uncertainty to Confidence: The Life-Changing Impact of Financial Education

Jacqueline Barton · Jul 27, 2025 ·

Every day, we make decisions that shape our financial future—whether it’s choosing a mortgage, planning for retirement, or simply deciding how much to save. Yet many Australians still feel uncertain about their financial choices. That’s where financial advice and education come in—not just as tools for wealth creation, but as pathways to confidence, clarity, and control.

  1. Confidence in Your Future

Research shows that Australians who receive financial advice are significantly more confident about their future. In fact, 70% of advised individuals report feeling more secure about their financial goals, and 79% say they sleep better at night knowing their finances are in order (2025).

This confidence stems from having a trusted adviser who helps you navigate complex decisions and plan for both expected and unexpected life events.

  1. Better Decision-Making

Financial literacy empowers you to make informed choices. Whether it’s selecting the right investment strategy or understanding the implications of a loan, education helps you avoid costly mistakes and seize opportunities.

According to a recent study by the Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA), pre-retirees who receive advice are twice as confident about having enough money for retirement than those who don’t (2024).

  1. Reduced Stress and Anxiety

Money is one of the leading causes of stress. But with the right guidance, you can gain clarity over your financial situation and learn strategies to manage it effectively.

A study by CoreData and IOOF (2021) found that 88% of Australians who received professional advice felt less financial stress than those who didn’t.

  1. Stronger Relationships

Financial stress can strain relationships with family and friends. By improving your financial literacy and working with an adviser, you can reduce tension and build healthier dynamics.

In fact, 41% of clients who received financial advice reported better relationships with loved ones (2020).

  1. Discovering What’s Possible

Financial advice isn’t just about numbers—it’s about unlocking possibilities. Whether it’s retiring earlier than expected, choosing the right school for your children, or living debt-free, advice helps you explore what’s achievable and how to get there.

Financial advice and education are life changing. They offer more than just financial returns – they provide peace of mind, empowerment, and the ability to live life on your terms.

Economic Update: July 2025

Jacqueline Barton · Jul 14, 2025 ·

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

Key points:

  • Tensions ease in the Middle East post US bombing run, Israel and Iran truce.

  • The US Federal Reserve held its interest rate ‘on hold’ citing tariff inflation risk, ECB cut 0.25%.

  • Australian economy softening and expecting further RBA interest rate cuts.

  • US equities close June at all-time highs, markets in general looking through the short-term noise

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact your Financial Adviser.

The big picture

At the end of June 2024, the S&P 500 had completed a stellar year with a gain of over 20%, while the ASX 200 recorded a solid gain of around 10% over that same period.

In spite of the chaos caused by Trump’s policies, and the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, these two equity indexes did surprisingly well – again – in the year to June 30 2025. The ASX 200 rose 10.0% in FY25 and the S&P 500 rose 13.6%.

The reciprocal tariff policy announcement by US President Trump on April 2nd 2025, for the so-called ‘Liberation Day’, caused a sharp fall in the S&P 500 of 18%. The recovery since that fall is the fastest on record for a decline of that order of magnitude.

A year ago, central banks were only just getting started on cutting interest rates as the inflation problem seemed to have been close to being beaten. Now, many central banks are close to having brought interest rates down to near neutral levels. Interestingly, the US and Australian central banks are not yet among that group.

The reason stated by the US Federal Reserve for not having cut further is ‘the unknown extent of the possible increase in inflation caused by Trump’s tariff policies’. There is yet no material sign of tariff-induced inflation in the US but many expect a one-off lift in inflation, driven by tariffs of around 1%.

Given that US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation-less-shelter has been running at around 1.5%, and shelter inflation (a third of the index) has been falling steadily, there is some optimism that US inflation might struggle to get above 3% even with tariffs (unless Trump revisits his trade-war policies). And then inflation should subside back to 2% as the imposition of tariffs should only cause a one-off increase in prices.

Trump has been berating Federal Reserve (Fed) chair, Jerome Powell, for being ‘too late’ to cut rates. Trump has threatened Powell’s position and has used insulting language against the man. Despite this, Powell has been calm and steadfast in his management of monetary policy.

The US economy, in terms of growth and jobs, is reasonably strong and so interest rate cuts are not necessarily urgent – but some slightly softer economic data, and the apparent containing of inflation, creates the opportunity for two or three more interest rate cuts this year.

Market probabilities for the next interest rate cut were firmly for the September meeting. However, three members of the Fed’s Open Markets Committee came out in favour of a July interest rate cut during the last weeks of June. The probability of a July interest rate cut remains low at circa 20%.

The RBA is expected to cut its interest rate in July and again (maybe more than once) over the rest of the year.

Australia’s GDP growth rate at 0.2% for the March quarter was unexpectedly low despite apparent resilience in the labour market.

A significant portion of new jobs in the last financial year were in the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) programme. While the majority of these jobs are possibly very useful additions to our health care initiatives, they are funded by the taxpayer and so do not reflect the strength of the economy.

Moreover, 10 of the last 12 reported monthly unemployment rates were 4.1% (the other two were 3.9% and 4.0%); an unusually stable set of data. The results are based on a small sample of around 26,000 households which is scaled up to represent a population of nearly 11 million households! We would have expected much more sample variation from month to month, as we usually observe.

We see no alarming signals in the broad macro data for Australia and the US. However, there are many possible sources of volatility in equity markets in the year ahead.

Trump’s retaliation tariffs were announced on April 2nd but were put on hold for 90 days – to July 9th – but only a few seem to think that the tariff increases won’t further be delayed – or even abandoned.

The average tariff before Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariff policy announcement was about 3% and now it is closer to 15%. Somebody has to pay for it. Tariff is only another name for tax.

Exporters might try to absorb some of the costs before they export. That doesn’t seem to be prevalent. Correspondingly the importer in the US can try to absorb the cost but that too is difficult. Marelli, a large supplier of auto parts in the US that imports parts for Nissan and Jeep amongst others, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as it found it couldn’t pass on the tariffs and it could not viably absorb their costs. Others will surely follow.

The third agent to wear the costs is the US consumer. We haven’t seen any material impact on consumer price indexes as many companies built up substantial inventories before the tariffs came in and are only now starting to pass on the additional cost. Some say the US might still have one to two months inventory at hand.

Nike just reported earnings and announced that prices will have to go up shortly; footwear is expected to rise in price by 8% to 15%.

Since lots of goods are not imported, or are imported from low-tariff countries, experts reportedly are estimating the increase in the CPI to be of the order of 1% p.a. If, however, Trump starts bringing back higher tariffs, the US economy is likely to be a casualty.

Tariffs, to date at least, are not bringing in anything like the tax revenue Trump had foreshadowed. Moreover, most if not all that revenue is coming from US consumers and businesses. It is largely a redistribution of tax revenue for the government and tariffs will almost certainly reduce consumption due to the price increases.

China redirected much of its exports to countries other than the US during Trump’s first term as President and is seemingly starting to do it again. And China is now switching to importing beef, soya beans and oil (amongst many other goods) from other countries. The US could become increasingly isolated, if it is not careful.

There is much more to these trade deals than tariffs. There is no mainstream economic support for tariffs to redress trade balances. Indeed, trade imbalances are to be expected and welcomed in many cases.

One contentious point for the US-China relationship involves the export of certain rare earth minerals to the US. China has a near monopoly on the production of special magnets (and other goods) from rare earths that are essential in the manufacture of Electric Vehicles, rockets (commercial and military), drones and other high-tech products.

The US reportedly thought that it had gained access to China’s rare earths through the Geneva talks held between the two parties in May, but the extensive text of the agreement only devoted one sentence to non-tariff trade barriers – and there was no mention of rare earths.

The London talks between China and the US, held in June, were then set up to resolve this issue but failed again. Rare earths were mentioned but sources reported that the agreement is only for six months and only covers commercial – and not military – uses. The can has again been kicked down the road, this time until the end of the year.

Ford reported several of its auto plants in the US were on idle as they awaited a supply of rare earth products. China is in the box seat with this and it is big enough to see this confrontation through.

Almost out of left field, Israel attacked Iran over its nuclear build-up. It does not have the fire power to resolve the issue on its own but that didn’t stop Israel starting a renewed, heightened conflict.

Trump went to the election last year on a non-aggression platform – as he did in in his first term. The US was in negotiations with Iran over uranium enrichment. After the Israeli rocket attack, Trump said he might do something over the next two weeks. It only took him a day or two.

The US sent B-2 stealth bombers and submarines to fire on Iran’s three main nuclear facilities that happen to lie in a straight line south between Tehran and Qatar on the Persian Gulf.

The US reported that all three facilities were destroyed without casualties and without serious damage to property other than that associated with the facilities. Perfect! And a cease-fire between Israel and Iran was ‘on the cards’ in the next 24 hours, so Trump said. That’s why Wall Street rallied hard that night.

CNBC reported that there was a long line of trucks outside the facility containing the enriched uranium over the weekend before the bombing. It was being speculated that the trucks were there to move the uranium to another location!

Trump called the raid something like the ‘most decisive raid in history’. An expert came on TV and said all the enriched uranium could have been placed in the boots of 12 standard cars.

Just to save face, Iran attacked the major Middle East, US base in Qatar. To make sure everything was fine, Iran gave prior warnings to Qatar and the US. Iran fired 14 missiles; 13 were intercepted and the other missed the target completely. Everyone was a winner!

Recall, Trump did ‘big trade deals’ with Qatar and Saudi Arabia only weeks ago. It is hard not to think there was collusion over orchestrating a face-saving resolution to the conflict and to take attention away from the failed tariff deals.

Other reports questioned whether the US bombs could have struck 300 feet [say 100m] below the surface [under a mountain?] to reach the facilities. We don’t know what the truth is but we are thinking the strike wasn’t as successful as Trump announced – but it might have been enough to make the Iranians seriously consider their options for continuing to engage in this current conflict.

The collective wisdom of experts we have seen is that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back months rather than years. But importantly, Iran now knows that stealth bombers can turn up when they are least expected and that they can carry lots of very big bombs [up to 30,000 pounds each!]. And there is now proof that Trump is prepared to push the button.

As the dust settles on the upheaval Trump has caused to trade, immigration, and efficiency (through the failed DOGE project run by Elon Musk) we are more optimistic about a less volatile future for Wall Street in the nearer term at least. The S&P 500 finished June with a new all-time high. Recent earnings reports have been stronger than expected and the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI) seems far more secure than some considered earlier in the year.

On the fiscal front, Trump has been facing a multitude of problems in trying to get his ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ through Congress. It is now passing through the Senate but it has to go back to the House of Representatives after substantial changes being made, and agreed to, by the Senate. Even Republicans were demanding changes!

Two are voting against the Bill and six were reportedly undecided.

The Bill, if it goes through, is likely to add just over $3 trn to the current $36 trn government debt. The bill includes tax breaks and a substantial lifting of the debt ceiling. The logic behind the bill is that it will stimulate the economy and that growth will improve government revenue to offset the tax breaks. Musk launched a scathing attack on the Bill and has vowed to back candidates against those Republicans that vote for the Bill.

On other matters that many think are likely to guide the future of the global economy, the advent of DeepSeek – a China ‘alternative’ to ChatGPT and other AI projects – earlier in the year caused many to think it might be the end for Nvidia and other big US technology firms. It wasn’t, and it looks unlikely to be. Nvidia reported well in June and many of the mega tech companies are promising to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the years to come.

It is important for investors to appreciate what AI can currently do and what more there is to do. Without that, the fear of losing jobs to AI is not rational.

At this point in time, AI is good at collecting information and summarising it. But it still makes lots of mistakes and needs human oversight to ‘train’ the models.

What AI cannot do at this point in time is reason or generalise. For example, it cannot answer the question, ‘What strategy should we follow for success in a given business’. Moving to the ‘super AI’ that will bridge this gap is what is consuming the top tech firms. Not only is the solution likely to be a long way off – it might never be achieved. Meta has reportedly offered sign-on bonuses of $100m each in poaching up to 10 AI experts.

To reason with facts and alternatives requires ‘weights’ to be applied to consolidate alternatives. That’s what human brains can do to differing extents. AI cannot yet do it at all.

Repetitive, low-level jobs are already at risk. True leaders in thought and business are very safe at the moment – and maybe for our lifetimes.

The outlook for equity markets for the coming period remains positive supported by continued growth and utility of AI and modest aggregate earnings growth generally however, at current elevated valuations they remain vulnerable to macroeconomic (e.g. detrimental tariff policy changes) and/or geopolitical shocks.

US bond yields have stabilised at levels comfortably below the ‘trigger points’ of 4.5% for the 10-year and 5.0% for the 30-year that caused equity market volatility in April and May.

Australian economic conditions are not great but will probably be boosted by multiple interest rate cuts by the RBA in the remainder of 2025. The ASX 200 finished the year to 30 June only a fraction (less than 0.5%) off its all-time high.

Asset classes

Australian equities

The ASX 200 made moderate gains in June (+1.3%) but gained +10.0% over the year to 30 June. If dividends were reinvested, the total return for the year (without franking credits) was 13.8%.

The Energy sector (+9.0%) and Financials (+4.3%) were the best performers for capital gains in June. Over the year to 30 June, Telcos (+36.7%), Financials (+29.4%), Industrials (26.2%), IT (+24.2%) and Consumer Discretionary (20.8%) were the stand-out sectors in terms of total returns. Health (-4.6%) and Materials (-2.3%) were the only sectors to go backwards over that period.

Our analysis of broker-based forecasts of company earnings for the coming year varies but in general are pointing to a positive outcome, providing we get no big surprises.

International equitites

The S&P 500 finished June very strongly – up +5.0% – and surpassed its all-time high on the last day of the month. For the year to 30 June, the S&P 500 gained 13.6%.

Of the major indexes we follow, the Nikkei gained the most over June at +6.6%. None of these indexes went backwards except for the DAX at -0.4% and the FTSE at -0.1%. Emerging Markets gain was +4.5%.

For the year to 30 June, the DAX gained +31.1%, the Shanghai Composite +16.1% and the FTSE +7.8%. Emerging Markets gained +10.6%. The Nikkei was the worst performer of the indexes we follow but it still grew by +2.3%. The World index grew by +14.7%.

BONDS AND INTEREST RATES

The Fed continues to resist Trump’s calls to cut interest rates but there is pressure coming from within for the Fed to cut in July. Two or three cuts are expected by the market in the rest of this calendar year.

The RBA is widely expected to cut its overnight cash rate (OCR) again in July. It appears to be on a rate cutting cycle taking this interest rate to around 3% by the end of the year – or lower!

The Bank of Japan was ‘on hold’ in June, as was the Bank of England. The Swiss National Bank cut its interest rate to 0.0%.

The big question facing policy and lawmakers in the US is what will happen to longer term rates. In the Senate hearing, a Republican senator berated Powell for costing the US economy $400bn this year by not cutting interest rates – due to the interest payments on debt.

The senator showed a complete lack of understanding of how monetary policy works. The Fed only has an impact on overnight rates and limited impact on yields one to two years out. It is possible, and has often happened, that an interest rate cut by the Fed might mean an increase in the 10-year and 30-year Government Bond yields! Longer-term yields are greatly affected by inflation and growth expectations, amongst other factors.

Other assets

Brent Crude oil (+5.8%) and West Texas Intermediate Crude oil (WTI) (+7.1%) prices were up in June. Over the year to 30 June, the losses were -21.8% and -20.1%.

The price of gold was flat (0.0%) in June while the price of copper (+6.0%) was up sharply again. Iron ore prices (-3.6%) were down.

The VIX ‘fear’ index is almost back to a near-normal level at 16.7 after peaking at 22.2 earlier in the month. The VIX peaked at 52.3 in the year to 30 June.

The Australian dollar (AUD) traded in a modest range over June but finished up by +1.8% on the month. Over the year to 30 June, our dollar was down by -1.1% against the US dollar.

Regional review

Australia

Australia jobs data for the latest month provided mixed evidence of an economy that is ticking along. There were -2,500 jobs lost but +38,700 full-time positions were created; there was an offsetting -41,100 part-time jobs lost. The unemployment rate was steady at 4.1%.

The March quarter GDP data were released in June and largely disappointed. Quarterly growth was 0.2%, which was less than the 0.4% expected. The annual growth rate was 1.3%. Per capita growth returned to negative territory with readings of -0.2% for the quarter and -0.4% for the year. The brightest spot in the National Accounts was a rise in the household savings ratio to 5.2% from 3.9%. We consider a reading in the range of 5% to 7% to be ‘normal’. After some time of having a low savings ratio, households are now back to trying to build for a solid future.

The Westpac and NAB consumer and business sentiment indexes were largely unchanged and weak.

The monthly CPI inflation data were at the low end of the RBA target range at 2.1% (headline) and 2.6% (core).

China

Inflation was again negative for the year at -0.1% but China is actively trying to stimulate its economy.

The wild swings in US import tariffs have disrupted shipments in the March and June quarters to try to minimise aggregate tariff revenue.

For example, in May, China’s exports to the world were up +4.8% but down to the US at -4.5%. Imports from the US were -18.0% but only down -3.4% from the rest of the world.

Industrial profits slumped -9.1% in the latest month. It will be at least some months before we will get data that can readily be interpreted.

China must redirect lost US demand to domestic demand and to new markets.

United States

US jobs were up +139,000 when only +125,000 were expected. The unemployment rate was steady at 4.2%. Wage growth was 0.4% for the month and 3.9% for the year.

GDP growth for the March quarter was revised down to -0.5% from -0.2% as imports were rushed in to beat the imposition of new tariffs.

The Atlanta Fed puts out ‘nowcasts’ ahead of the official GDP data. Its current estimate for June quarter growth is 2.9%. The OECD predicts growth for 2025 to be 1.6% and the same for 2026.

The respected University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey reported a bounce back to 60.5 from 52.2.

The 1-year inflation expectations data came in at 5.1% which is well above the Fed’s estimate of 3.2% but down from its previous month’s reading at 6.6%.

Retail sales were -0.9% for the month and +3.3% for the year. When adjusted for inflation the readings were -1.0% for the month and +0.9% for the year. There are nascent signs of a weakening consumer, but an interest rate cut is not urgent – just desirable.

Europe

UK growth slumped to -0.3% and the unemployment rate rose to 4.6% from 4.5%. The minimum wage was increased by 6.7% in an attempt to play catch up on the ground lost over the last couple of years due to the cost-of-living crisis.

The European Central Bank (ECB) cut its interest rate for the 8th time by 25 bps to 2.0%. Inflation was under control at 1.9%.

The Swiss National Bank cut its rate by 25 bps to 0.0%.

How intuitive tech is helping to solve the great adviser talent drain

Jacqueline Barton · Jun 25, 2025 ·

Australia’s advice gap is well documented: with fewer than 15,600 licensed advisers and over 11 million people needing financial guidance, there’s just one adviser per 1,695 Australians. The numbers clearly don’t add up.

The unmet advice needs for a huge swathe of Australians is one of the great challenges of the modern advice era.

As experienced advisers retire or burn out – and too few new recruits step in – firms are grappling with rising workloads and shrinking teams. Amid concern over a “great adviser talent drain”, many see AI and automation as either the saviours or the job stealers.

The reality is more nuanced. Technology isn’t a silver bullet, but rather, it’s a lever. It’s tempting to view AI and automation as panaceas, but the real breakthrough comes when we design technology around people, not the other way around.

True progress comes not from replacing people with machines, but from embedding intuitive tools (AI-powered and others) that amplify the impact of advisers, paraplanners and support staff.

When AI is integrated into human-centred workflows, it frees people from repetitive tasks, giving them more time to focus on high-value client work. This empowers advisers and support teams, boosting morale, productivity, client outcomes and satisfaction – helping to shrink the advice gap and build a smarter, more scalable advice business.

Here’s how:

Better tools, better business performance

This isn’t about “robo” advice. It’s about embedding intuitive, human-centred tools that reduce administrative burden and elevate the client experience – enabling advisers and support teams to focus on what they do best.

Tools like stochastic and optimisation modelling simulate hundreds of “what if” scenarios in seconds, helping advisers make faster, more informed decisions. Intelligent templates pre-fill the right questions and disclosures, while workflow “playbooks” guide teams through repeatable, compliant processes. Smart “portals” provide clients an engaging digital experience, enabling a degree of self-service to supplement human service. These are foundational shifts that streamline and improve the entire advice engine.

The proof is in the numbers. While the industry average is around 97 clients per adviser, some tech-enabled advice firms in our community are serving double, triple or even quadruple that number – without sacrificing quality or compliance. This scale was unthinkable just a few years ago, but the time clawback and efficiency gains are helping to improve several business and service metrics, and it’s also becoming the benchmark for advice businesses using the right tools.

As processes become more efficient, business performance lifts. Advisers gain the capacity to serve more clients without burning out. In turn, the support stalwarts of quality advice – the paraplanners – find the headspace and the confidence to step into higher advice roles, strengthening the internal talent pipeline. And as production friction eases, profit margins improve.

In short, the smartest tech doesn’t replace people – it empowers them. It’s the catalyst for a more scalable, sustainable and human advice model, helping to close the advice gap.

A people-first approach to practice efficiency

It’s not just advisers who benefit from smarter systems – it’s everyone behind the scenes.

Client service officers, paraplanners and operations staff do the heavy lifting to keep practices running, yet they’re often overlooked in transformation efforts. When equipped with intuitive, integrated tools – from real-time collaboration platforms to dynamic modelling software and transparent task tracking – the impact is immediate. Workflows tighten, bottlenecks clear and confidence grows.

Importantly, these tools aren’t developed in isolation. They’re built and refined in close partnership with the people who use them – through structured feedback loops involving paraplanning collectives, operational teams and adviser councils. This ensures system updates reflect the day-to-day needs of real users, not just top-down assumptions.

The result? More paraplanners stepping into strategic roles. More client service staff confidently managing client engagement. More team members aspiring to become licensed advisers. These are signs of real cultural shift – not from external hiring drives, but from nurturing the talent already embedded in advice businesses.

A virtuous cycle of professional growth

Magic happens when efficiency gains spark a compounding cycle of talent development.

As support teams build confidence and capability, firms can promote from within and retain valuable institutional knowledge. Paraplanners and client service officers see clear pathways to adviser roles, supported by tools, mentorship and meaningful development opportunities along the way.

This internal progression doesn’t just benefit individuals – it strengthens the entire business.

As more support staff move into advice roles, the adviser pipeline thickens. Mentorship cultures flourish, where seasoned advisers pass down expertise and new advisers bring fresh thinking to client conversations. The result is a richer, more collaborative environment – where experience and innovation feed off each other.

And clients are the real winners – the reason we do this work.

More advisers mean more Australians getting the help they need. And when that growth comes from within – led by people who already know the practice, the systems and the clients – the benefits multiply. Sustainable growth in advice doesn’t come from replacing people with tech but from empowering them to grow, contribute meaningfully and stay in the profession for the long haul.

Looking ahead: closing the advice gap from the inside out

At its core, advice is a human profession. And while technology can help us move faster and scale smarter, it’s the people behind the tools who make lasting impact possible.

The real return on investment comes when businesses commit to a people-first ethos – co-creating solutions with their teams, listening and investing in long-term development. That’s how you transform a static workforce into a vibrant talent pipeline.

Now is the time to build advice businesses that grow from within. Because the most valuable asset we have isn’t the software – it’s the people who use it.

Let’s stop asking if technology alone can solve the advice gap. It can’t. But when paired with a people-first mindset and a commitment to internal growth, it becomes a powerful enabler of the resilient, human-centric advice profession Australia truly needs.

Written by Darren Steinhardt, Founder and Managing Director, Infocus

Credit mistakes to avoid

Jacqueline Barton · Mar 29, 2025 ·

Managing your credit responsibility is vital for financial health. Whether you are applying for a credit card, a loan, or a mortgage, it is essential to maintain a good credit history to secure the best terms and interest rates. However, it is easy to fall into common credit traps that stop financial goals being achieved due to a low credit score. Here you can find the top credit mistakes to avoid and how to prevent them.

1. Neglecting to Check your Credit Report

Staying on top and monitoring your credit is the best way to not only track your progress, but to ensure no errors or fraudulent activity. By neglecting your credit report, you risk impacting your ability to secure credit because of issues left unnoticed. Fortunately, many major credit bureaus offer free credit reports annually, making it easy to stay informed. Regularly reviewing your credit report is crucial to spot potential problems and addressing them before your credit score and financial goals are negatively impacted.

2. Missing Payments

The most influential factor of your credit score is your payment history, and a single late payment can stay on your credit report for seven years. Ensuring you pay bills on time not only boosts your credit score but also helps you in avoiding penalties. The best way in avoiding missed payments is to request payment reminders from your lenders, or better yet, setting up automatic bank transfers. This will ensure you never miss a bill, and your credit growth will stay on track.

3. Only Making Minimum Payments

Although it might seem like your debt is more affordable when only paying minimum payments on your credit card, this can cause long-term financial problems for your future. While it does mean your account is kept from falling into arrears, paying only the minimum means you are not making much progress on reducing your balance. In turn, this can result in high-interest charges and a prolonged debt, damaging your credit score. To avoid this, strive to pay more than minimum where possible in an aid to reduce your debt efficiently and keep a healthy credit score.

4. Applying for Too Much Credit

Having multiple credit applications in a short period can damage your credit score as too many inquiries in a short time frame can signal to lenders that you are taking on more debt than you can handle. This will lower your credit score and reduce your chances of getting approved for credit and loans such a mortgage in the future as you appear financially risky to lenders. If having multiple credits is something you seem necessary, it is important to space out these applications at least 6 months apart to protect your credit score.

By avoiding mistakes such as neglecting your credit report, missing payments, making only minimum payments and applying for too much credit, you’ll be in a better position to maintain a health credit score. Staying discipline is key to achieving a strong credit rating and set yourself up for long-term financial success.

Economic Update – March 2025

Jacqueline Barton · Mar 20, 2025 ·

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

Key points:

  • President Trump policy initiatives drive increased volatility in markets and geopolitics
  • Despite some economic softening corporate earnings continue to hold up
  • Without the NDIS impact our labour market is not as robust

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact your Financial Adviser

The Big Picture

At last, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has started its interest rate cutting cycle by reducing its overnight cash rate (OCR) by 0.25% (or 25 bps) to 4.1%. The last hike (+25 bps to 4.35%) was made in November 2023 and the first hike in that cycle was in May 2022 after more than a year at the ‘emergency setting’ of 0.1% to help withstand the impact of the pandemic. While we believe the rate cut was needed last year, getting it now is a better outcome than continuing to wait.

The RBA is charged with a dual mandate of maintaining: (1) price stability and (2) full employment. The problem is, inflation and unemployment data have been confounded in the last few years by the interest rate rises and the growth in the NDIS scheme.

At the end of February, the Federal Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, argued that landlords should bring rents down in line with the first interest rate cut and those that might follow. We agree with this causal relationship but it makes no sense unless Chalmers also admits that the interest rate rises in the overnight cash rate, from 0.1% to 4.35%, flowed through to a rapid rise in mortgage payments and, hence, to rents. Part of the rate increases caused higher inflation – working against RBA reasoning.

Rents are a significant component in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) basket of goods and services and the current rate of rent inflation is 5.8%, which is down from 7.8% in August 2023. Because of the length of leases, rent inflation tends to react to changes more slowly than many other items in the CPI basket.

The RBA argument that inflation was sticky and that delayed making interest rate cuts is fallacious. Cutting rates sooner would have taken pressure off mortgage rates and rents.

Recent reports highlighted that the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) has expanded rapidly in the past two years. Many of the people now employed through the scheme were previously doing similar work but without being paid and, hence, classified as being unemployed.

While the principle of the scheme is laudable, the newly classified ‘carers’ and others as among the official employment data has led to a misunderstanding of how to interpret employment growth and levels of the unemployment rate.

It has been reported that the majority of jobs created in 2024 were due to the NDIS expansion. Since the jobs are funded from taxpayer revenue, they do not reflect how ‘hot’ the labour market is from market forces.

It is true that the same could be said about other government employees – such as teachers, nurses and police – but we are not saying that this source of employment and funding is inappropriate. We are saying that the rapid change in the NDIS means that a 4.1% unemployment rate today is not comparable with 4.1% two or three years ago. Our ‘back of the envelope’ estimate of what the unemployment rate would be without the NDIS is in the range

of 5% to 6%. If the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) had published unemployment rates in that range, the RBA would have been slashing its cash interest rate much earlier in this cycle.

When the growth in the NDIS slows as the programme reaches maturity, it will not make the unemployment rate rise but employment growth should fall. This situation will become the ‘new normal’; the ‘old normal’ is not entirely relevant now.

It has also been reported that the NDIS sector has lower productivity than the traditional sectors – and NDIS pay is lower. Therefore, we expect aggregate wage growth and productivity to continue to be lower going forward.

February began with US President Trump signing executive orders to impose 25% tariffs on Canada (but 10% on energy) and Mexico – and an additional 10% tariff on China.

The Mexico and Canada tariffs were pushed back from an immediate start to the beginning of March. The delay was due to Mexico and Canada each agreeing to put 10,000 more troops on their respective borders with the US to combat illegal immigration and the importation of fentanyl (an addictive pain relief medicine).

At the end of February, Trump announced in a speech that he was also going to impose a 25% tariff on the European Union (EU). On the last day of February, Mexico announce it was sending a number of ‘drug cartel lords’ to the US to face charges. That maybe enough to keep Trump pushing back the deadline for the new tariffs.

It is important to appreciate that Trump has a very different way of communicating from most other leaders. He blusters and barks to appeal to his supporters. He has stated that tariffs and other measures are designed, in part, as a negotiating tool to get other ‘deals done’. For this reason, it is extremely difficult to interpret what Trump will do as opposed to what is said in the threats. Markets move on these Trump diatribes and so cause market volatility as the normal market approach is to sell first and ask questions later.

We regularly analyse the LSEG (Refinitiv) survey data on forecasts of individual company earnings and dividends collected from prominent brokers. The data so far are holding up well so the medium-term market trend might be reasonable but short-term volatility might make for a bumpy ride.

Recent market volatility was exacerbated by the launch of DeepSeek by ‘high-flier’ a hedge fund based in China. This software uses a different technology to ChatGPT and other US generative AI applications. China claims it was very much cheaper to develop and has big efficiency gains in terms of the need for advanced chips (such as those designed and sold by Nvidia) and power consumption.

Since there appears to be no independent corroboration of the China claims, we do not know to what extent DeepSeek will be adopted in the West.

Nvidia, the once biggest stock in the US by market capitalisation, took a sharp price hit on the news but Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, seems confident about the future of its business. He predicts the next generation of AI will require ‘100x more’ computing power.

Five of the seven ‘mag 7’ stocks (7 largest technology companies listed in the US) just reported earnings above consensus broker expectations and similarly six of them on revenues as well. All the hyperscalers (large, powerful and heavy users of data) reporting their earnings after the DeepSeek launch. All predicted strong growth in capex (capital expenditure) going forward.

For security reasons, DeepSeek has been banned from use in various government and military departments in the US, Australia and elsewhere.

As far as the Artificial Intelligence (AI) boom is going, it is important to appreciate that companies like Nvidia provide infrastructure – advanced chips that are used in mammoth computing systems.

Some fund managers in the tech space are predicting that the next wave in AI will be in software. Currently, many of these companies are small but will grow rapidly over time. We think the AI boom will last many years, if not decades but, as always, we don’t expect markets to move in straight lines!

Around the world many central banks are scampering to cut their interest rates. New Zealand just made its fourth successive cut – the latest being 50 bps – to 3.75%. The ECB has cut interest rates four times since June and is expected to cut again in March. The German economy is struggling with -0.2% growth in the December quarter of 2024 after 0.0% in the September quarter. Canada made its sixth rate cut at the end of January.

In essence, there are long and variable lags between interest rate changes and the reaction in the real economy – these are typically of the order of 12 to 18 months. As we wrote last year, being ‘data dependent’ was destined to fail because waiting for weakness to appear before starting to reduce interest rates means at least another 12 – 18 months of economic weakness after rates are returned to neutral levels.

Australia’s situation has been masked by immigration flows and the growth in the NDIS. There have already been seven successive quarters of negative per capita growth. The RBA might not cut rates at its next meeting (April 1st) because of the proximity of that board meeting to the impending Federal election. The latest Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) poll has the Liberal National Party (LNP) ahead of Labor by 55:45 in a two-party preferred vote.

The US was thought to have dodged a bullet and engineered a soft landing – but some economic data softened at the end of February. GDP was revised downwards slightly to 2.3% for December quarter 2024 (from 3.1% in September) but per capita personal disposable income was revised downwards in December 2024 from 2.1% to 1.9%.

More telling is the latest US consumer confidence index published by The Conference Board. It fell from 112.8 last November to 98.3 in February coinciding with the increased chatter over Trump 2.0! And inflation expectations are up. It is not surprising if the pundits keep talking about problems arising from mass deportations and big tariffs that the general population factors in that scenario. We think the effects have been exaggerated not least because some of the measures will not be implemented – or will be quickly removed.

Markets are only pricing in one or two more interest rate cuts in the US this year and up to three more in Australia. US inflation (excluding shelter) has been on target for many months, but fear of the unknown exacerbated by Trumps policies and style of governing is unnerving many. If there are a few months of ‘reasonable’ Trump policies being enacted, the Fed could start cutting interest rates again.

Asset Classes

Australian Equities

The ASX 200 fell sharply (-4.2%) over February but the selling was not across the board. Indeed, four of the eleven sectors witnessed healthy gains. This behaviour is symptomatic of a sector rotation and not a panic sell-off.

The index is up 0.2% for the year-to-date. The financial (FY25) year-to-date witnessed gains of 5.2% which is a very reasonable return given past historical averages.

In essence there has been a big momentum rally over the last two years and it seems investors are now searching for the next big theme.

International Equities

The S&P 500 also lost heavily over February before recovering somewhat in the last couple of trading hours (-1.4%). The DeepSeek launch seems to have triggered a sell-off of the Mag 7 stocks but there has been plenty of interest in non-tech sectors.

The German share market index the DAX (+3.8%), London’s FTSE (+1.6%) and the Shanghai Composite (+2.2%) swam against the US tide.

Bonds and Interest Rates

Doubt surfaced towards the end of February that the Fed might not have successfully engineered a ‘soft landing’ (lowered interest rates without having an economic recession) for the US economy. The 3-month to 10-year bond yield spread (differential) on Treasurys inverted again (the yield on 3-month securities is higher than the yield on 10 year securities). Whilst this ‘inversion’ is touted as a precursor for a recession it didn’t work as an indicator of a

recession in 2022 – and a few times before – so we are not in the recession-is-imminent camp but nor are we saying that a recession will not happen we are keeping an open mind and monitoring data and events closely.

The market has walked away from the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed) prediction of four interest rate cuts this year made in December 2024. However, the market is still expecting one or two rate cuts in the remainder of 2025 – and, maybe, even three.

With one interest rate cut under its belt, the RBA could be set for another two or three cuts this year, but a lot will depend on how the Trump tariffs and other policy machinations work out. There is too much ‘noise’ around to get a good feel for direction of the markets and economies.

The Bank of England (BoE) cut interest rates again in February – by 25 bps to 4.5%.

There is sufficient strength in Japan inflation to expect that the Bank of Japan (BoJ) will achieve its desired aim to get its interest rate up from the current 0.5% to 1% by the end of 2025. The decades of low inflation and even deflation now appear to be behind it.

New Zealand has a struggling economy, and the Reserve Bank of NZ (RBNZ) just cut interest rates at its fourth successive meeting – this time by 50 bps to 3.5%.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) just cut its interest rate for the first time in five years by 25 bps to 6.25%

Some have questioned whether the ’neutral rate’ that neither quickens nor slows the economy has increased in recent times. It was thought to be around 2.5% to 3% for Australia and the US before the interest rate hikes started post Covid. Some are now saying the neutral rate might be closer to 4%. We think this view might be misguided as the full force of the interest rate hikes has not yet filtered through to the real economy.

All four Australian major banks were quick to announce cuts to their mortgage rates – by 25 bps – after the RBA cut its interest rate in February.

Other Assets

Brent Crude Oil (-4.7%) and West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil (WTI) (-3.8%) oil prices were down in February.

The price of gold rose 1.5% in February.

The price of copper (+5.1%) was up sharply but iron ore prices (-1.3%) were down.

The VIX ‘fear’ index measure of US share market volatility rose to moderately high levels (21.1) towards the end of February as the possible tariff wars resurfaced, but it closed the month at 19.5. Given the intense concern over what Trump may or may not do, it is somewhat surprising that the VIX has not been trading higher. The market seems to be trading on the ‘Trump put’ – that he will take corrective action when necessary. There is the common belief that he judges his success by the state of the market.

The Australian dollar (AUD) traded in a wide range ($US0.6116 to $US0.6397) over February but finished flat.

Regional Review

Australia

Australia must hold a general election by mid-May. Whoever wins the election will be faced with an uphill task to breathe life back into the economy. As population growth slows, it will become even more apparent that economic growth has stalled.

However, the jobs numbers just out for January seemingly painted a rosy picture of the health of the labour market. The unemployment rate only rose to 4.1% from 4.0% and 44,000 new jobs were created. We believe the faster-

than-usual population growth, together with the rapidly growing NDIS scheme is masking the poorer level of health of the economy.

Retail trade grew over the year by 4.6% but that is reduced to 1.1% when price inflation is taken into account. The volume of sales are growing at about half of the pace of population – we are consuming less per person on average than a year ago.

CPI inflation was in the middle of the RBA target range, but electricity price inflation was -11.5% because of the way the ABS is trying imply a price inflation figure from a fixed-dollar subsidy per household.

The wage price index rose 3.2% over the year or 0.8% after price inflation is accounted for. Wages, after being adjusted for inflation, are still about 6% less than in 2020 as the pandemic began.

China

China needs to expand its stimulus package. Last year, growth came in (exactly) on target at 5.0% and 4.7% is expected for 2025.

A lot will depend on how China and the US interact over the tariff and trade situation, and the related tensions that have escalated recently.

US

The nonfarm payrolls (jobs) data came in at an increase of 143,000 from an upwardly revised 307,000 in the prior month. The unemployment rate was 4.0% and wage inflation was 4.1%. We note many of the created jobs are in the government sector.

December 2024 quarter economic growth was only minimally revised in the first of the two planned revisions each quarter. December quarter 2024 growth stands at 2.3% compared to the 3.1% recorded in the September 2024 quarter. Per capita real disposable income was revised down for the December 2024 quarter from 2.1% to 1.9%.

Retail sales were up 4.2% on the year or 1.2% after allowing for price inflation.

However, the Atlanta Fed, that publishes a regularly updated GDP forecast reported that earlier in the month their preliminary forecast for the March quarter 2025 was 2.3% but it fell to -1.5% on the Private Consumption Expenditure (PCE) Inflation measure report on the last day of February.

Trump has started so many initiatives it is not possible to report and discuss all of these in this update. We prefer to wait and see what actually changes before attempting to assess the implications.

Europe

The European Central Bank (ECB) continues to cut its interest rate and is expected to continue to do so. EU inflation rose to 2.5% from 2.4% but this is not, we believe, due to interest rate cuts. Rather, there are many factors at work in determining inflation. The EU economy is weak.

It was reported that the average German worker in 2023 took 19.4 days sick leave compared to 15 days the year before. The UK reported only 5.7 sick days in the same year. It was reported that the younger workers – GenZ – are struggling to keep up with the older workers.

German inflation came in at 2.8% for February after having been under 2% in September of last year. Rising inflation and a slowing economy are the preconditions for stagflation. It is too early to call that yet, Europe’s economy is struggling.

The BoE cut its rate to 4.5% from 4.75%. UK growth was 0.1% in the December 2024 quarter following 0.0% in the September 2024 quarter.

Rest of the World

Trump started to negotiate directly with Russia over the Ukraine war. He started off without including Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy but when he did, in front of cameras in the Oval Office, the meeting got heated.

Trump blamed Zelenskyy for not wanting a cease fire and not thanking the US for its support. Trump campaigned on being able to negotiate a swift end to the war and he was visibly frustrated by Zelenskyy’s intransigence as he sought security guarantees as part of the deal. Trump all but threatened to withdraw support. Various European leaders followed up giving their support which has been lacking to date. Given the state of the European and UK economies, it is not obvious that they could match the support that the US has given to date.

The S&P 500 fell from about +0.5% before the discussion on the last day of February to -0.5% as Trump cancelled the press conference. A White House official reported (tweeted) that ‘Trump had kicked Zelenskyy out of the White House’ – with no official farewell. The index then rallied very hard to close up +1.6% on the session.

Trump also suggested that the USA should rebuild Gaza and resettle the current residents. That suggestion quickly lost traction as did the notion of taking charge of the Panama Canal, Greenland and turning Canada into the 51st state of the US. As they say, “The situation is fluid”

How to Protect Yourself Against Inflation

Jacqueline Barton · Feb 11, 2025 ·

The cost-of-living pressures are hurting everyday Australians and it doesn’t look like it’s going to get better anytime soon. From groceries to petrol to bills, everything is going up and we are all chasing our tails trying to keep up.

In times like these, safeguarding your wealth is pivotal by adapting some simple financial strategies. Here are a few practical strategies that can be used in protecting you and your family against inflation to strengthen your financial foundation for the future.

1. Know where your money is going (tracking your spending)

When costs are on the rise, every dollar saved counts, and tracking your spending is the best way to know exactly where all your money is going. Are you paying for streaming services that you don’t use? Or maybe you are eating out more than cooking at home? Going through your bank and credit card statements is a great way to identify what has been spent, and determine areas that can be cut back. Lowering these discretionary costs won’t make a major difference to your lifestyle, but will reduce the financial strain.

2. Invest in Real Assets

One of the best ways in protecting yourself against inflation is to invest in real assets as these are known to appreciate in value over time. Investing into residential, commercial or industrial properties can deliver capital growth, along with ongoing rental income which will provide a dependable hedge. Additionally, commodities such as gold, silver and oil are also known for performing well in inflationary environments, with their prices rising in line with inflation. Investing in the physical commodities, or through commodity-focused ETFs and mining stocks will allow you to gain exposure within this asset class.

3. Diversify your Portfolio

Having diversification across asset classes and geographies can help in mitigating your risk. If one asset was to be impacted, you will still have others that may be performing better. Expanding out of the Australian’s market and looking at some global investments in countries with a lower inflation rate can provide a nice balance along with additional growth. Alternative assets such as private equity or infrastructure projects can also offer a shield against your wealth as they are less correlated with traditional stock markets.

4. Consider Inflation – Protected Investments

Specifically designed to help preserve your wealth during times of rising prices, inflation protected investments ensure that your purchasing power isn’t affected by adjusting their value in line with inflation. Government bonds such as Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are designed to keep pace with inflation so your investment is able to uphold its purchasing power. Additionally, inflation-linked bonds offer returns that regulate in changing economic conditions that further enable you to protect your income from the effects of inflation.

While inflation can erode purchasing power, making it difficult to maintain your lifestyle, these effective solutions can help in protecting your wealth and ensuring you are well prepared for the economic challenges ahead.

Are you getting enough sleep?

Jacqueline Barton · Feb 3, 2025 ·

In todays fast-paced world, it’s easy to sacrifice sleep in the name of productivity. Something as crucial as breathing, and as vital as eating, somehow seems to get overlooked and its importance slowly slips away from us.

Sleep isn’t just about resting, its about our bodies and minds recharging so that we can be the healthiest versions of ourselves. Not to mention, sleep plays a crucial role in keeping us sharp, focused and productive at work and in our day to day lives.

According to Professor Siobhan Banks, we are seeing a significant number of our population getting less than six hours a sleep a night, and this is leading to all sorts of issues with productivity at work, sleepiness leading to accidents on the road, and of course major health issues.

So, if you are not getting enough sleep, here are some simple yet effective tips to help you rest easy and wake up feeling refreshed.

  1. Consistent Sleep Schedule

Setting yourself a consistent time to fall asleep and wake up each morning, even on the weekends, is key. This allows your body to regulate your internal clock which in turns makes it easier to fall asleep at night, and aids in waking up naturally each morning.

  1. Create a Sleep Friendly Environment

If you want a good night’s sleep, it is important to set yourself up in the right environment. Ensuring your bedroom is dark, quiet and cool will help your body relax and drift off to sleep. White noise can also be helpful in distracting the mind to switch off, and if possible, limit the amount of electronics in the room to mitigate any distractions.

  1. Turn off Screens Before Sleeping

Whilst we live in a world full of screens, the blue light from our TVs, computers and phones are causing harm to our sleep. Try turning off all screens at least one hour before bed, and try calming activities like reading, which signal to the body its time to wind down.

  1. Monitor Your Food and Caffeine Intake

What you eat and drink leading up to bed time can have a significant impact on the quality of your sleep. Try not eating large meals before bed, and limit your intake of caffeine and alcohol as these substances can stay in your system for numerous hours leading to disrupted sleeping.

  1. Exercise Regularly

Maintaining a regular exercise regime can significantly improve your sleep as physical activity helps to regulate the body’s sleep-wake cycle. However, it is important not to undergo vigorous exercise right before bed as this can have the opposite effect, making sleep difficult. Try and aim for a morning walk, or an afternoon workout.

Getting enough sleep is essential in maintaining both your physical and mental health. By following these few tips and tricks to prioritise your sleep, you will soon enough see the improvements in your sleep quality, feel more rested in the mornings, and be more productive during your day.

Economic Update: January 2025

Jacqueline Barton · Jan 20, 2025 ·

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

Key points:

  • The Fed cut US interest rates in December and the economy remains resilient
  • The RBA remains on hold, but the chance of a February 2025 rate cut is rising
  • The rally in AI related shares looks set to continue
  • Trump policies appear to be positive for equities but also inflationary – how this plays out is unclear

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact your Financial Adviser.

The Big Picture

In early 2024, it became obvious that the performances of a small number of stocks were dominating growth in the US S&P 500 Share Index. The market has been led by the so-called ‘Magificent Seven’ (or, later, the ‘Mag 7’), which are the biggest mega-cap technology companies and includes Microsoft, Apple, Amazon Nvidia, Alphabet (Google) Meta (Facebook) and Tesla.

At the same time, in the popular press, ChatGPT, became the poster-child of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) industry. However, the so-called ‘generative AI’ applications that could write a resume or even an assignment at school or university wasn’t the main game; it was just an easy-to-understand, visible application.

Generative AI applications are only a segment of the entirety of AI innovations. Think facial recognition on CCTV cameras, detection of who is using a mobile phone while driving and the universe of applications is rapidly expanding. Then add on some serious scientific work in medicine, exploration and defence and we quickly conclude that it is almost impossible to even try to guess the magnitude of the impact of the AI-led new industrial revolution.

So, when some corners of the media and finance commentators were obsessing with the notion of a speculative bubble in the price of shares related to AI in early 2024, we felt that this rally was for real and that relevant share prices were supported by commensurate growth in earnings. Of course, all rallies are not a straight-line event and have dips along the way but what we are experiencing now is not like the dotcom boom and bust that occurred at the turn of the twenty-first century. In 1999-2000, companies were launching on the share market on the dream of some new, unproven idea. In 2024, NVIDIA, the major AI-chip manufacturer, was already scaling up production and making big profits. By mid-2024, NVIDIA was the biggest company in the world by market capitalisation.

To inform our views we base some of our market analysis on the survey of broker-forecasts of company earnings by LSEG (formerly Thomson Reuters). Led principally by the Mag 7 the S&P 500 index quickly got ahead of its ‘end of year’ 2023 forecast in 2024. Australia has much more limited exposure to AI and the forecasts of the ASX 200 were a much closer fit to what was actually achieved.

The question we now face is – where do we go from here? The S&P 500 gained 23% in 2024 when historical averages have been single figure growth rates. And that 23% was on the back of 24% growth in 2023! The AI rally started before most realised it! In two years, the S&P 500 index had gained 53%! Any investor who exited the market at the end of 2022 for whatever reason (wars, pandemics, etc) has failed to participate in this significant rally.

Broking analysts have caught up – to some extent – with the possible impact of the AI revolution. Forecasts of the growth in the S&P 500 for 2025, based on the broker survey, are at about half the gains experienced in either 2023 or 2024. But that is still a double-digit growth and greatly in excess of previous historical averages.

Many things are likely to buffet the market in 2025 but investors with an appropriate understanding of the risks involved might consider staying with the momentum trade currently in play in the US – at least for a while to come.

Another huge change in sentiment over 2024 was in the opinion of when (or indeed if) central banks would start cutting interest rates. Inflation was falling – but not initially quickly enough for everyone.

The US Federal Reserve (Fed) was not the first to start its cutting cycle but, on 18 September 2024, the Fed started off with a ‘double cut’ of 0.50% (or 50 basis points (bps)) and everyone took note. The latest and third Fed rate cut was in December and by 25 bps to have the Federal Funds cash interest rate in the range 4.25% to 4.50% at year end, a full 100 bps below the level before the interest rate cuts started.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) hasn’t started cutting its official cash interest rate yet and has maintained an interest rate of 4.35% since early November 2023 – this is about the same level as the Fed after its extensive 100 bps of rate cuts.

The RBA is claiming our rate of inflation has been too stubborn in falling to its target range of 2% to 3%. That might be true, but some of the components – such as rents – are unlikely to be reduced by higher interest rates. In fact, the opposite is true if landlords are trying to maintain their margins by raising rents because of higher mortgage rates.

The Royal Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) learned its lesson the hard way. It was particularly aggressive and vocal in raising rates higher for longer because it stated it wanted to see inflation fall first before it started cutting rates. It was forced to do two 50bps cuts back-to-back but that didn’t save the economy – it just slipped back into recession. Further evidence that monetary policy takes effect with long and variable lags.

So, did the RBA dodge a bullet and do the right thing over the last couple of years? Using a simplistic definition of a recession (two consecutive quarters of negative growth in GDP), Australia hasn’t yet slipped into one – but that is because of our unusually high immigration following the pandemic. When we look at per capita (per household) GDP growth, we have just experienced seven consecutive quarters of negative growth. Soft retail sales bear this out.

Our peer group of developed world central banks such as the Bank of England (BoE), European Central Bank (ECB), Bank of Canada (BoC), Swiss National Bank, and the Swedish National Bank, have all started cutting their interest rates. Indeed, the BoC has now cut by a total of 175 bps from 5.0% to 3.25%. Canada, like us, has experienced a string of negative per capita growth rates.

If there was any credibility to the ‘theory’ of how monetary policy works, this array of different actions and responses should not have happened.

The impact of interest rates on GDP also requires some assessment of what has been happening to fiscal (Government economic) policy. The Australian government had a big influx of revenue (tax) from the impact of a very fast ramp up in economic activity following the relaxing of Covid restrictions. These tax revenues in part were used to provide additional fiscal stimulus. This in turn kept upward pressure on prices due to rampant demand but still constrained supply which fed inflation and led to the RBA increasing interest rates in response.

We can see the impact of government spending on GDP by examining the latest National Accounts. The latest (not per capita) GDP was 0.3% for the September quarter. Since government expenditure contributed 0.3% to GDP, it would have been 0.0% without it. On top of that contribution, another 0.3% was due to government investment. In other words, without the government contribution, our GDP would have fallen by ‑0.3%. Because of the windfall gain in government revenue, the government deficit did not blow out! Treasurer Jim Chalmers is claiming this as a victory for the government as it helped to avoid a recession.

If we dig deeper, the government pump-primed the economy for possibly very good reasons (pandemic slow down). However, the RBA was trying to do the opposite. We can argue that the excess demand that the RBA thinks is causing inflationary pressures is not from households (private sector) but the government or public sector. Households are hurting in the continued cost-of-living crisis.

The average wage price index is down about 7% since the end of 2019 – after we allow for inflation. If all wages were spent on the consumer basket of goods and services that would be a bleak signal for households. They would be consuming 7% less ‘things’ like quantities of meat, number of weekends away, education and the rest. But the situation is even worse than that for many, particularly those with variable interest rate mortgages.

Some of the wages are spent on mortgages or rents (only about one third of the population are immune from both). Huge jumps in mortgage rates combined with largely variable rate mortgages have taken a big slice from wages so the impact on consumer goods and services is much worse than the picture we just painted. In the US, most mortgages are fixed rate and are based on 30-year interest rates so Australian households hurt much more than their American counterparts in a monetary policy tightening cycle.

For renters, we know that rents are running well ahead of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Inflation due to pandemic-related supply issues and higher than average immigration. Renters are also hurting more than the 7% fall in inflation-adjusted wages would suggest. What about the much-maligned baby boomers in, or going into, retirement who own their own homes? Many of them do not earn wages anymore; they are living off past savings, superannuation and government pensions. They are also negatively impacted by the cumulative impact of inflation. The RBA argument about households (particularly boomers) causing inflation is a difficult one to make.

And the argument that boomers are better off from higher interest rates is a misnomer as Bank account interest rates, while higher now, never-the-less have been consistently below the rate of inflation, meaning that the purchasing power of their savings is dwindling and most do not have enough super to maintain a comfortable lifestyle.

It might be heretical to raise, but some leading economists have argued interest rates do not affect inflation. Could inflation have fallen as it did – across the globe – because the supply constraints dissipated? Its quite possible but not provable. But to argue that some of the pain caused by central banks was for nought cannot be dismissed by economic evidence.

Returning to the US Fed, it does seem almost a miracle that growth and the labour market still seem strong, and inflation excluding shelter, has been under 2% for months. What about US President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act? It has been liberally scattering cash around to households. This may be a good thing but economics never gives clear cut outcomes. When central banks (monetary policy, interest rates) work against governments (fiscal policy government spending) it is difficult to determine cause and effect.

So which way are the central banks heading in 2025? The Fed cut back its ‘indicative’ four US interest rate cuts in 2025 to two at its last meeting. Market rates suggest that there is little chance (11%) of a rate cut at its next meeting in January but a cut before mid-year is quite possible. Another rate cut might be forthcoming in the second half of 2025.

Market interest rates (government bonds and corporate debt) now are pricing a greater than 50% chance of an RBA interest rate cut at its February meeting and more cuts might follow quickly. It is harder to predict RBA activity because we do not yet know the full extent of the impact of recent policy decisions i.e. to not cut interest rates. The US might have pulled off a miraculous economic ‘soft landing’ as economic growth and employment are so far holding up. Conversely, Australia is already in a per capita recession.

We see 2025 setting up to be a good but not great year for investors. There are a combination of positives and negatives for investment performance that will impact the outcome.

On the negative side, growth in some large economies is slowing which could see corporate margins come under increasing pressure. Also, some sectors of share markets are considered expensive e.g. IT and financials which could make further increases in share prices somewhat harder to achieve.

On the positive side, corporate balance sheets are not over stretched and margins have been maintained which is supportive of share prices. Trends in markets remain positive driven largely by bigger technology companies and, in particular, those exposed to AI.

In relation to AI, revolutions happen from time to time. There was the invention of the wheel, weaving machines to make cloth, and transport was massively sped up by applications of the internal combustion engines in ships, trains, cars, and aeroplanes. While we cannot predict whether AI is a revolution, there is no doubt it is a significant innovation and technological advancement. What we are confident of is that it would be foolish to ignore it or dismiss it as a fad. 2025 will see further developments in, and applications for, AI. Whether these developments continue to support the rally in share prices and markets is a separate question which will be addressed as the year unfolds.

Elsewhere, conflicts in the Ukraine and the Middle East continue. China’s economy is struggling a little but the government has started a major economic stimulus programme – which we expect to continue in 2025 and be a positive fillip for Australian exports, resources in particular.

Incoming US President Donald Trump will be inaugurated on 20 January 2025, heralding what we think will be a presidency similar in character to Trump’s first term from 2016 to 2020. There are three of Trump’s key policies that are getting our serious attention: tariffs, immigration and government expenditure.

It is hard to argue that Trump’s motives do not reflect his believes but the method and extent needs analysing. Trump placed tariffs on many countries and goods in his first term. The world did not end and President Biden seemingly made no attempt to remove them. We suspect Trump wants to negotiate better deals with the world and is brandishing his big tariff stick as his chosen method of persuasion.

Illegal immigration was getting out of hand even before Trump’s first term. A government department estimated that there were over 11 million illegal immigrants in the US three years ago – and Biden opened the floodgates quadrupling the flow but then cut that flow to ‘just’ doubling the previous immigration rate.

Trump started to build his ‘Border Wall’ in his first term. A bit more of a wall and other restrictions might help. But as to ejecting those 11 million plus illegals, is ambitious in the extreme. To suggest that the authorities could even find them all, transport them to some other country, and have that country accept them is a monumental challenge let alone the cost of it. While this policy is popular with voters, we do not see how it can be effectively implemented.

As to the Elon Musk led Department of Government Expenditure (DOGE) cutting massive amounts from expenditure immediately is also fanciful but someone needs to try and address the 36 trillion-dollar debt. The US Government deficit was recently reported as being $1.8 trillion of which $1.16 trillion were interest payments on that debt. That situation cannot continue and growth in the deficit needs to be addressed. The problem got a lot worse over the last four years. Some of that worsening was necessary as it helped the US economically survive the pandemic but that level of Government expenditure was not pulled back as the pandemic receded. Indeed, the massive Inflation Reduction Act just kept the problem growing.

Besides these three pillars of Trump’s policies, it seems to be widely accepted that Trump will cut the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15% and emphasise deregulation for US companies. It is yet to be established how the tax cut would be funded. Trump may think revenue from tariffs might cover part of the tax shortfall but, as yet, costings do not seem to be available.

Here in Australia, we are soon to vote on who will govern our country. The suites of competing policies have not yet been announced. The electorate, based on recent polling, does not appear to be too happy with Albanese’s government so the election has the potential to deliver a close outcome.

Since we must always make our investment decisions based on what we currently know or reasonably expect, we are comfortable with a portfolio diversified across a range of higher quality assets. The future is uncertain and our goal is to manage the portfolio to be positioned to benefit from changes in the economic, geopolitical and investment environment as they occur.

Asset Classes

Australian Equities

The ASX 200 had a strong 2024 – up 7.5% and up 11.4% when reinvested dividends are included. However, the index lost ground in the final month (‑3.3%). Most sectors were down in December.

If the newly announced China stimulus package takes hold, it could help our resources sector to play catch up.

International Equities

The S&P 500 recorded many all-time highs during 2024 finishing the year up 23.3%. However, the index lost ground in December (‑2.5%).

The LSEG survey of broker-forecasts on US company earnings points to above average returns in 2025 – but not as good as the last two years.

Bonds and Interest Rates

The Fed cut in September (50 bps), November (25 bps) and again in December (25 bps) – but it cut back its dot plot insight into future rates from four to two cuts for 2025. The market is comfortable with that.

The RBA stood firm again at its December board meeting but almost flagged a first cut in February. Some modelling is suggesting a second cut in quick time. Only recently, three of the big four banks pushed out their forecasts for a first cut from February to mid-year. The market is very uncertain and such uncertainty is not good for sound planning.

The Bank of Canada is all but in panic mode with its cutting cycle. It has now cut rates from 5.0% to 3.25%. Sweden also cut in December (‑25 bps) and the Swiss National Bank by a double cut of 50 bps. The Bank of Japan and Bank of England were on hold. The RBA is emerging as a central bank that is behind the curve!

Other Assets

Brent (2.3%) and WTI (5.3%) oil prices were up in December but largely flat over the year.

The price of gold pulled back (‑1.3%) in December but up 27.1% on the year.

The price of copper was down in December (‑1.1%). The price of iron ore also fell in December (‑3.2%) but finished the month just above $US100 /tonne.

The VIX ‘fear’ index ended December at an elevated level (17.4) after starting the month in the normal range,

The Australian dollar further depreciated against the US dollar by -4.6% for December and ‑9.2% for the year.

Regional Review

Australia

Australian jobs data remained in a ‘normal’ range. 35,600 jobs were created of which 52,600 were for full-time positions and ‑17,000 were for part-time positions. The unemployment rate fell to 3.9% from a recent high of 4.3%. Wages are not acting as though the labour market is tight.

When the employment data are transformed into year-over-year growth rates, full-time, part-time and total growth all converged on 2.3% indicating that the part-time bubble might be behind us. Only a few months ago, part-time positions were growing at 6.8%!

CPI inflation looks to be in the range at 2.4% but some of this reduction is due to a statistical artefact introduced by the ABS to include government energy subsidies.

GDP growth came in at 0.3% for the quarter and 0.8% for the year. In per capita terms, those rates are ‑0.3% and ‑1.5%, respectively. The household savings ratio rose to 3.2% from 2.4% suggesting households have been able to restore some sort of reasonable savings plan. An indicative range in ‘normal times’ for households is 5% to 6%.

China

The China manufacturing PMI improved to 50.3 from 50.2 in November; a modest value but, nonetheless a slight improvement. The December PMI slipped to 50.1. Industrial profits fell over a 12-month period to November (‑7.3%) – the fourth such consecutive negative read.

Retail sales missed expectations at 3% compared to expectations of 4.6% and from a previous read of 4.8%. Industrial production matched expectations at 5.4%. We expect China to continue to monitor the situation and add more stimulus as necessary.

US

The nonfarm payrolls (jobs) data came in at 227,000 after a hurricane-affected very low number the month before but the unemployment rate climbed to 4.2% from 4.1%.

Inflation is largely contained in the US. If we exclude shelter from the CPI, the inflation read would have been 1.6%, or well below the target 2% rate.

Retail sales volumes showed some strength at +1.0% for the latest 12 months. The final (revised) GDP read for the September quarter was 3.1% up from the preliminary read of 2.8%.

The expected Trump corporate tax cuts and an emphasis on deregulation should support profitability in the US.

Europe

UK inflation rose to 2.6% from 2.3% and the Bank of England remained on hold at 4.75% after recently making its first cut. The ECB cut its rate to 3.0%.

Rest of the World

Canada, like Australia, is experiencing positive GDP growth. However, Canada has posted six consecutive negative quarters of per capita growth (compared to Australia’s seven). Yet Canada has made 175 bps worth of cuts to end 2024 with a terminal rate of 3.25%. Australia has not yet made any cuts and its overnight cash rate at the end of 2024 stands at 4.35%!

The US commenced attacks on Iran-backed Houthis based in Yemen who are in turn attacking shipping in the Red Sea.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 7
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Important information
  • Disclosures & disclaimers

Platinum Investments (NSW) Pty Ltd and Trimac Holdings Pty Ltd,
trading as PT Wealth
ABN 16 698 445 925
Corporate Authorised Representative No. 0012673
Suite 8, Level 9, 111 Phillip Street
Parramatta, NSW, 2150

Infocus Securities Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 47097797049
AFSL 236523
Level 2, Cnr Maroochydore Road & Evans Street
Maroochydore, QLD, 4558

Platinum Investments (NSW) Pty Ltd and Trimac Holdings Pty Ltd, trading as PT Wealth ABN 16 698 445 925 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Infocus Securities Australia Pty Ltd ABN 47 097 797 049 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence No. 236523.

The information contained on this website has been provided as general advice only. The contents have been prepared without taking account of your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should, before you make any decision regarding any information, strategies or products mentioned on this website, consult your own financial advisor to consider whether that is appropriate having regard to your own objectives, financial situation and needs.